Neuroscientists should set a high bar for evidence against free will

Published by Tomáš Dominik on

Roskies, A. L., Schurger, A., & Maoz, U. (2025). Neuroscientists should set a high bar for evidence against free will. Scientific American.

Related Posts

No evidence for modulation of the readiness potential by respiratory phase during natural breathing

Jeay-Bizot, L., Chishti, R., Maoz, U., & Schurger, A. (2026). No evidence for modulation of the readiness potential by respiratory phase during natural breathing. PLOS Biology, 24(9), Article e3003982. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003982

Factors that influence the amplitude of the bereitschaftspotential

Triggiani, A. I., Whitmarsh, A., Schurger, A., Maoz, U., & Hallett, M. (2026). Factors that influence the amplitude of the bereitschaftspotential. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 106738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2026.106738

Mid-level perceptual features, and not ambiguity, accelerate access to awareness

Amir, N., Maoz, U., & Mudrik, L. (2026). Mid-level perceptual features, and not ambiguity, accelerate access to awareness. Neuroscience of Consciousness, 2026(1), niag006. https://doi.org/10.1093/nc/niag006